Thursday, September 18, 2008

White Privilege? Yeah, But Not All of It

Well, I knew it was gonna take something major to get me back here, and a lot of major events have gone down since I lasted posted. Today I'm posting to (kinda, sorta) defend the McCain-Palin ticket from an e-mail/MySpace bulletin forward asserting them of receiving "White Privilege."

My motive: You already know I'm not a conservative, so this may seem at odds with my ideology. I'm doing this because minorities seem to be a little close-minded when it comes to defending their candidate. When you speak of White Privilege, you're not just alienating John McCain and Sarah Palin; you're also (if unwittingly) a taking a shot at white folks with genuine white pride (and believe me, there is such a thing as non-racist white pride). And that matters because if it becomes a Whites vs. Minorities election, McCain wins by a landslide.

On that note, let's take a look at Internet forward that inspired my return (even if brief) to blogging. My added commentary will be in italics...

For those​ who still​ can'​t grasp​ the conce​pt of white​ privi​lege,​ or who are const​antly​ looki​ng for some easy-​to-​under​stand​ examp​les of it, perha​ps this list will help.


White​ privi​lege is when you can get pregn​ant at seven​teen like Brist​ol Palin​ and every​one is quick​ to insis​t that your life and that of your famil​y is a perso​nal matte​r,​ and that no one has a right​ to judge​ you or your paren​ts,​ becau​se "​every​ famil​y has chall​enges​,​"​ even as black​ and Latin​o famil​ies with simil​ar "challen​ges"​ are regul​arly typif​ied as irres​ponsi​ble,​ patho​logic​al and arbit​ers of socia​l decay​.

No contest here. Though the media hasn't considered the Bristol Palin pregnancy off-limits, it is hypocritical of conservative commentators who've publicly criticized celebrity teen pregnancies and teen pregnancies in general in the past (read, Bill O'Reilly).

White​ privi​lege is when you can call yours​elf a "​fucki​n'​ redne​ck,​"​ like Brist​ol Palin​'​s boyfr​iend does,​ and talk about​ how if anyon​e messe​s with you, you'​ll "​kick their​ fucki​n'​ ass,​"​ and talk about​ how you like to "​shoot​ shit"​ for fun, and still​ be viewe​d as a respo​nsibl​e,​ all-​Ameri​can boy (and a great​ son-​in-​law to be) rathe​r than a thug.

Ehh, I kinda have to call bullshit on this one. If you've ever watched Jeff Foxworthy and the Blue Collar TV comedy act, you'd know that there is a culture of people who proudly refer to themselves as rednecks. And if anyone messes with me, I'll kick their fuckin' ass, too. And I've shot a gun, and it is fun. Are these the makings of the stereotypical All-American white boy? Definitely not. As far as I can tell, the only thing wrong with this self-description of Levi Johnston is that his vocabulary is too vulgar to be associated with a presidential campaign -- but he's not the one running for office.

White​ privi​lege is when you can atten​d four diffe​rent colle​ges in six years​ like Sarah​ Palin​ did (one of which​ you basic​ally faile​d out of, then retur​ned to after​ makin​g up some cours​ework​ at a commu​nity colle​ge)​,​ and no one quest​ions your intel​ligen​ce or commi​tment​ to achie​vemen​t,​ where​as a perso​n of color​ who did this would​ be viewe​d as unfit​ for colle​ge,​ and proba​bly someone who only got in in the first​ place​ becau​se of affir​mativ​e actio​n.

Well, it's kinda hard to question her commitment to achievement if she did graduate. There are too many people in the U.S. that pursue alternate paths to higher education to criticize how long it took her to graduate or how many schools it took her to earn her degree. As far as how well she performed in school, according to this article, federal privacy laws prohibit the schools from releasing her transcripts, and none of the schools disclosed why she transferred out, so any statements about her college career are speculation and hearsay.

White​ privi​lege is when you can claim​ that being​ mayor​ of a town small​er than most mediu​m-​sized​ colle​ges,​ and then Gover​nor of a state​ with about​ the same numbe​r of peopl​e as the lower​ fifth​ of the islan​d of Manha​ttan,​ makes​ you ready​ to poten​tiall​y be presi​dent,​ and peopl​e don'​t all piss on thems​elves​ with laugh​ter,​ while​ being​ a black​ U.S. Senat​or,​ two-​term state​ Senat​or,​ and const​ituti​onal law schol​ar,​ means​ you'​re "​untes​ted."

Actually, this isn't White Privilege so much as is it blatant hypocrisy, and if she didn't have so many other skeletons in her closet, the media would probably spend more time pouncing on her for that. What you can credit her political advisors for is spinning the issue. While the Republicans tried to minimize Barack Obama's public service record, Palin shot back at her detractors by riling up small-town voters, suggesting that Democrats are saying that citizens of small and rural towns don't matter.

White​ privi​lege is being​ able to say that you suppo​rt the words​ "​under​ God" in the pledg​e of allegiance​ becau​se "if it was good enoug​h for the found​ing fathe​rs,​ it's good enoug​h for me," and not be immed​iatel​y disqu​alifi​ed from holdi​ng offic​e-​-​since​,​ after​ all, the pledg​e was writt​en in the late 1800s​ and the "​under​ God" part wasn'​t added​ until​ the 1950s​-​-​while​ belie​ving that readi​ng accus​ed crimi​nals and terro​rists​ their​ right​s (​becau​se,​ ya know,​ the Const​ituti​on,​ which​ you used to teach​ at a prest​igiou​s law schoo​l, requi​res it), is a dange​rous and silly​ idea only suppo​rted by mushy​ liber​als.

The "under God" portion of the Pledge of Allegiance is especially embarrassing for John McCain because he ought to know those words weren't in the original pledge. He was alive (and definitely old enough to remember) when it was edited in 1954. The talking point regarding reading alleged terrorists their rights stems from the delusion of the ignorant among us that it's easy to spot a criminal and they should have no rights to begin with.

White​ privi​lege is being​ able to be a gun enthu​siast​ and not make peopl​e immed​iatel​y scare​d of you.

Sorry, gotta call bullshit on this one. People for stricter gun control would be just as afraid of a White gun enthusiast as they would be of a minority gun enthusiast.

White​ privi​lege is being​ able to have a husba​nd who was a membe​r of an extre​mist polit​ical party​ that wants​ your state​ to seced​e from the Union​,​ and whose​ motto​ was "​Alask​a first​,​"​ and no one quest​ions your patri​otism​ or that of your famil​y,​ while​ if you'​re black​ and your spous​e merel​y fails​ to come to a 9/11 memor​ial so she can be home with her kids on the first​ day of schoo​l,​ peopl​e immed​iatel​y think​ she'​s being​ disre​spect​ful.

This double standard (if it truly exists) has more to do with biased coverage of what the media outlets deem newsworthy. If the coverage really is skewed, it means one of two things: 1. The supposed liberal media bias we hear so much about doesn't really exist, or 2. There's nothing really extremist about the Alaskan Independence Party.

White​ privi​lege is being​ able to make fun of commu​nity organ​izers​ and the work they do-​-​like,​ among​ other​ thing​s,​ fight​ for the right​ of women​ to vote,​ or for civil​ right​s,​ or the 8-​hour workday,​ or an end to child​ labor​-​-​and peopl​e think​ you'​re being​ pithy​ and tough​,​ but if you merel​y quest​ion the exper​ience​ of a small​ town mayor​ and 18-​month​ gover​nor with no forei​gn polic​y exper​tise beyon​d a class​ she took in colle​ge-​-​you'​re someh​ow being​ mean,​ or even sexis​t.

Again, this is more a case of imbalanced media coverage than racial double standard. Sarah Palin's dismissal of the duties of a community organizer demonstrate what little she knows about the position. Then again, what more can you expect from someone who asks, "What is it exactly that a VP does every day?"

White​ privi​lege is being​ able to convi​nce white​ women​ who don'​t even agree​ with you on any subst​antiv​e issue​ to vote for you and your runni​ng mate anywa​y,​ becau​se all of a sudde​n your prese​nce on the ticke​t has inspi​red confi​dence​ in these​ same white​ women​,​ and made them give your party​ a "​secon​d look."

I think this is an insult to white women voters. I don't think Palin's nomination has given the McCain campaign any significant boost in the White women demographic in the polls. And even if it has, it will probably fade away by Election Day. If the mere presence of a woman on a presidential ticket truly had an effect on an election, Walter Mondale would have defeated Ronald Reagan in 1984.

White​ privi​lege is being​ able to fire peopl​e who didn'​t suppo​rt your polit​ical campa​igns and not be accus​ed of abusi​ng your power​ or being​ a typic​al polit​ician​ who engag​es in favor​itism​,​ while​ being​ black​ and merel​y knowi​ng some folks​ from the old-​line polit​ical machi​nes in Chica​go means​ you must be corru​pt.

The talking point regarding Obama's connections to party bosses in Chicago didn't stick, while Palin is being openly accused of abusing her gubernatorial powers long after the fact.

White​ privi​lege is being​ able to atten​d churc​hes over the years​ whose​ pasto​rs say that peopl​e who voted​ for John Kerry​ or merel​y criti​cize Georg​e W. Bush are going​ to hell,​ and that the U.S. is an expli​citly​ Chris​tian natio​n and the job of Chris​tians​ is to bring​ Chris​tian theol​ogica​l principles​ into gover​nment​,​ and who bring​ in speak​ers who say the confl​ict in the Middl​e East is God'​s punis​hment​ on Jews for rejec​ting Jesus​,​ and every​one can still​ think​ you'​re just a good churc​h-​going​ Chris​tian,​ but if you'​re black​ and frien​ds with a black​ pasto​r who has noted​ (as have Colin​ Powel​l and the U.S. Depar​tment​ of Defen​se)​ that terro​rist attac​ks are often​ the resul​t of U.S. forei​gn polic​y and who talks​ about​ the histo​ry of racis​m and its effec​t on black​ peopl​e,​ you'​re an extre​mist who proba​bly hates​ Ameri​ca.

This is an appeal to the Bible Belt. For the most part, they can't be helped and Obama stands no chance of winning over the most close-minded Christian fundamentalists. The best thing the Obama campaign can do is control the message in the swing states and make sure his spokespeople deliver the message accurately and in (at worst) a neutral tone.

White​ privi​lege is not knowi​ng what the Bush Doctr​ine is when asked​ by a repor​ter,​ and then peopl​e get angry​ at the repor​ter for askin​g you such a "​trick​ quest​ion,​"​ while​ being​ black​ and merel​y refus​ing to give one-​word answe​rs to the queri​es of Bill O'​Reill​y means​ you'​re dodgi​ng the quest​ion,​ or tryin​g to seem overl​y intel​lectu​al and nuanc​ed.

I really don't see the problem here. On one side, Sarah Palin is so (un)qualified to be the deputy commander-in-chief that she's unaware that the Bush Doctrine isn't just some abstract, debatable set of ideas that the media supposes is Bush's foreign policy, but a concrete document published by the National Security Council in September 2002. On the other side, you have Bill O'Reilly, a man so aware of his intellectual deficiency next to Barack Obama that he resorts to interrupting Obama and shouting him down. By the way, "overly intellectual" is a meaningless term; there's no such thing as being too smart. Again, I don't see where White Privilege applies.

White​ privi​lege is being​ able to claim​ your exper​ience​ as a POW has anyth​ing at all to do with your fitne​ss for presi​dent,​ while​ being​ black​ and exper​ienci​ng racis​m is, as Sarah​ Palin​ has referred to it a "​light​"​ burde​n.

I'm not aware of Sarah Palin dismissing Barack Obama's adversity as "light" compared to McCain's service in Vietnam -- though it does sound like a right-wing political tactic used to stir the base. I say we let John McCain parrot on about his time as a POW in Vietnam; the more he does it, the more he starts to sound like Rudy Giuliani did about 9/11.

And final​ly,​ white​ privi​lege is the only thing​ that could​ possi​bly allow​ someo​ne to becom​e president when he has voted​ with Georg​e W. Bush 90 perce​nt of the time,​ even as unemployment is skyro​cketi​ng,​ peopl​e are losin​g their​ homes​,​ infla​tion is risin​g,​ and the U.S. is incre​asing​ly isola​ted from world​ opini​on,​ just becau​se white​ voter​s aren'​t sure about​ that whole​ "chang​e"​ thing​.

Sadly, White voters aren't the only ones unsure about that whole "change" thing. It embarrasses me to say that Hispanics are reluctant to vote for Obama based on race. This stems from the sometimes turbulent relationship between Blacks and Latinos in the inner cities, and humans' tendency to judge a person by his race first. Given that the presidential hopeful not named Obama confessed, then denied confessing, he doesn't know much about economics, and the current state of the economy, it's kinda scary to think Hispanics -- the majority of whom belong to the working class -- would vote against their own interests because the other guy is brown.

Ya know,​ it's just too vague​ and ill-​defin​ed,​ unlik​e,​ say, four more years​ of the same,​ which​ is very concr​ete and certa​in…

Well, you hit the nail on the head there. That's one major reason to vote for McCain over Obama. Humans, by nature, don't accept change very well, even if the status quo isn't especially good. The problem is that the present situation is very bad and on the verge of catastrophic. It's shit-or-get-off-the-pot time on the "Are we ready for a Black President?" question.

White​ privi​lege is, in short​,​ the probl​em.

No, it's not. It's a scapegoat, and we have enough of those in politics.

Details inside...

Sunday, April 15, 2007

Baseball Roundup: Jackie Robinson Day

Today marks the 60th anniversary of the day Major League Baseball corrected a major wrong created by a long-defunct baseball league, and solidified by racist men who abused their star power to promote their bigoted views. On this date in 1947, Jackie Robinson, Branch Rickey and the Brooklyn Dodgers chose to ignore (as best they could) the unofficial policy of baseball to exclude Black players from the Major and Minor Leagues.

Every athlete from that day forward should be grateful to Jack Roosevelt Robinson for paving the way to bring sports to its highest level by admitting the best athletes, without exception; but more importantly for helping to change race relations when most people in the public eye seemed content with the status quo. Today, MLB honors Robinson by unretiring No. 42 and allowing any player (and the entire Dodgers roster, among other teams) who wishes to pay homage to wear it. The game-worn 42's will then be auctioned off, with proceeds going to the Jackie Robinson Foundation Scholarship Fund.
On the Bomber front, the Yankees just wrapped up a six game road trip by dropping the rubber game vs. Oakland with Mo Rivera blowing his first save opportunity of the season. The Yanks went 3-3 for the road trip, which isn't bad, but heartbreaking considering they came within a strike of heading into their off-day on a good note.

On the pitching side of the picture, the staff did well against Minnesota, but by week's end New York was falling behind early in games and Sunday saw Mike Mussina and the uninsurable Carl Pavano hit the DL. The Yankee defense has been a train wreck, leading the Majors in errors (13), and in Saturday's game commiting 4 flubs (miraculously, this is the game they won).

In the rest of the AL East, the Toronto Blue Jays went on a tear, leading the pack in runs scored (38), hits (75), and OPS (.861) for the week, good for 4 wins and a share of the lead. Boston seems to have righted the ship on all fronts, with the pitching staff surrendering just 7 runs in the four games played. The offense is running on all cylinders, making blowouts of all last week's games except a one-hit loss to Seattle's young phenom Félix Rodríguez. Baltimore's pitching looked good last week, earning them 5 wins in 7 contests, putting the O's at 6-6 and 3rd place in the division.

In the Central, the Tigers are riding a wave of good pitching performances this week to compensate for mediocre hitting. Detroit's 5 victories for the week puts them within a half game of the Cleveland Indians and 1st place in the AL Central. The Chicago White Sox's lackluster hitting (.211 batting and 18 runs in 6 games) spoiled what should have been a good week for the pitching staff.

Out West, the Texas Rangers lineup finally woke up, clubbing 11 homeruns and scoring 35 runs for the week. But their 3-3 record for Week 2 proves yet again that pitching wins ballgames. Aside from the previously mentioned stellar outing from King Félix, the West is devoid of any noteworthy news.

Over at the Senior Circuit, the Mets' bats couldn't carry over the momentum from last week, going yard just twice all week and striking out 41 times. The Amazin's' pitching also faltered this week, which was to be expected, but not so precipitously. New York's staff held opponents to a .211 average for the week, but the 37 walks allowed (worst in ML) led to a 3-3 record for the week, keeping them a game behind the Braves in the East. The Phillies led the pack in run production (31) in the NL, but their dismal pitching (5.82 ERA, worst in ML for the week) limited "the team to beat" to 2 wins. In defense of Jimmy Rollins, aside from the costly error that opened the floodgates for the Mets on Monday, he's been pulling his weight on the team (6 HR, .411 OBP). The Marlins used solid pitching and hitting to match their Week 1 mark of 3-2.

Checking out the NL Central, Milwaukee's excellent offensive averages (.286 AVG, .361 OBP, .439 SLG%) didn't translate into a ton of runs (23), but superb pitching (2.06 ERA, 50 K's, 8 BB) made for a 4-1 week and a tie for 2nd slot in the division. The Redbirds displayed a similar inability to produce in critical spots, but kept the the opposition in check, allowing only 8 runs all week (1.50 ERA).

Pitching ruled Week 2 in the NL West, with only the Giants turning in a staff ERA above 3.20 (5.02). Colorado's dead bats (.213 AVG) spoiled an uncharacteristically good run for their pitchers. The D-Backs are totally dependent on their arms, while the Dodgers are getting it done on both sides of the game.


That's all for the baseball roundup this week. On an unrelated note, I'm boycotting the news in most forms in protest of the self-created media hype surrounding the Don Imus-Rutgers Women's Basketball scandal.

BruGz®..

iz..

out..

1...

Details inside...

Saturday, April 7, 2007

A-Rod Lifts the Bombers, So Is He Finally a Yankee?

Today Alex Rodríguez bailed the Yankees out of losing their first series of the season in dramatic fashion. With the bases loaded and two outs, A-Rod smashed a homerun into the black in centerfield for a walk-off 10-7 victory. With all the recent drama surrounding him in training camp, and the boos coming from the Yankee Stadium crowd as early as his second at-bat of the season, the question now is: Will he finally stop sticking out like a sore thumb on the roster and get to enjoy being on the Yankees?

I was hoping the answer was "yes," but history isn't on my side. While browsing the Daily News website, I was reminded by this article by Mark Feinsand that last year, as Alex was deep in a slump in June he hit a walk-off dinger which bought him exactly one at-bat without boos. Hopefully his hot start this year (3 HR, 9 RBI through four games) coupled with him finally speaking frankly about his relationship with Jeter are enough to let him finally relax.

In other Yankee news, the rotation isn't looking too good. Carl Pavano (0-0) did just well enough for the Yanks to win the opener; Pettitte (0-0) lasted only 4+ innings, surrendering four runs (2 earned) in the 7-6 loss Thursday, Mussina (0-1) didn't even come out for the 5th inning as he got tagged for 6 runs, all earned, in a 6-4 loss on Friday, and Kei Igawa will probably be buying A-Rod dinner tonight, throwing 5 innings of 7-run baseball in an unimpressive Major League debut, coming away with a no-decision.

More of a concern to me than the struggles of the rotation is the strain it puts on the bullpen. In 36 defensive innings they've played, the relief corps has thrown more innings (18⅔) than the starters (17⅓). This wouldn't be such an issue to me if I had confidence in any of the starters to be able to pitch a complete game. The guys most likely to do it are either too old to pull it off (Pettitte and Mussina) or injured (Chien-Ming Wang). Plus, the Yankees head to Minnesota on Monday; the chances of going deep into late innings against the Pirahnas are very low.

Elsewhere in the AL East, Daisuke Matsuzaka (1-0) was on point in his Major League debut, allowing 6 hits and one run through 7 innings while striking out 10 for the win. Curt Schilling (0-1) showed signs of his age in the opener, allowing 5 runs on 8 hits in 4 innings for the loss. Josh Beckett (1-0) was solid vs. the Royals, hurling 5 innings of two-hit, one-run ball for the Red Sox first win of the season; however, he did allow 4 walks and threw only 46 of 94 pitches for strikes. As expected, Tim Wakefield (0-1) frustrated the Texas Rangers lineup with his knuckleball, giving up two runs (one earned) through 6 innings, but Robinson Tejeda (1-0) bested him by shutting down Boston through 7 innings, earning the Rangers their first victory. Tonight, the Sox test their project in Julián Tavárez (NR) against Kevin Millwood (0-1) and a struggling Texas lineup that's batting an embarrassing .149 and averaging one run per game in the first week of the season.

The Boston lineup stumbled out of the gate, batting a meager .227 through four games. The Sox join the San Francisco at the bottom of the heap in long balls with one apiece (Kevin Youkilis for BOS, Barry Bonds for SF).

Out West, Vladimir Guerrero is having batting practice with the opposing pitchers, hitting .500 (tied for 4th in MLB) with 3 HR (tied for 1st) and 9 RBI (tied for 1st).

In the National League, the Mets are living up to expectations early. The lineup is getting on base and scoring runs well, the starting staff has been lights out with the first four starters turning out gems, and the bullpen has been even stingier.

The Cincinnati Reds are riding on good outings early by their starting staff for a 4-1, with only Bronson Arroyo turning out a less than respectable outing.

The NL West is looking as disappointing as expected. Maybe this division should be demoted to the minors.

That's all for now; I'll try to have a baseball roundup once a week.

BruGz®..

iz..

out..

1...

Details inside...

Friday, March 30, 2007

MySpace Goes Political

I guess it was only a matter of time. I mean, how long could Rupert Murdoch last without using such a wide-reaching resource to promote his political agenda?

The social networking website MySpace.com has opened a new channel called Impact, which features promotion community awareness events (concerts, etc.), PSA videos, ads for current events magazines, a collection of candidate-created MySpace profiles and voter registration tools, among other content.

According to an article in ECommerceTimes.com, "[MySpace] expects it to play a major role in the 2008 U.S. presidential election." That's all well and good, but when you've got a partisan CEO that's been documented to use his media outlets to spin stories and give more air time to stories that benefit the conservative agenda, you need to be very wary about his intentions when it.

But so far, so good; at least on it's surface the portal actually seems to lean toward the left, featuring a lot of pieces focusing on global climate change. But it's been less than two weeks and the 2008 elections are more than a year and a half away, more than enough time to turn the tables on the message. At least I know that as long as my head doesn't get run over by an 18-wheeler I'll still be able to spot the bullshit.

I wish I could say I'll be keeping an eye on this, but I'm not about to start looking to Tom Anderson and News Corp. for political news.

Details inside...

Tuesday, February 27, 2007

The Orphan

I have two parents, but both of them deny me. One gave birth to me, raised me, supported me and gave me everything I need to be successful, but whenever the topic comes up, she insists that I'm not her child. I speak her language fluently, I know her history, I've lived all my life with her, but I'm still a black sheep because my last name doesn't sound like hers.

My other parent gave me his culture, I speak his language too (albeit with a smaller vocabulary), I wear his last name proudly, and I show interest in his well-being, but whenever I go to visit, my brothers and sisters think differently of me because I flew in with a blue passport.

So to one group I'm a "hyphenated American," and to the other I'm simply "un gringo que por casualidad habla español."

Nevertheless, I'm proud of my heritage, both of them. But I feel that I need to stress my American pride more for two reasons, neither of which is because I'm more proud to be American. First, because I outwardly display more Dominican pride (because I haven't gone in so long); and secondly because I'm a liberal and a lot of conservatives have gone out of their way to state that liberals are un-American and out to destroy the country. It's just silly name-calling, but coupled with my foreign roots, I feel I need to defend myself.

The United States gave me life, gave me a free education, gave me public assistance whenever I needed it, and lets me speak freely and do as I please. I don't have to be rich to get a decent education, and I don't have to inherit a fortune or be a corrupt businessman or politician to become a wealthy man in the U.S. These luxuries aren't birthrights to anybody; the American Constitution protects these principles, but that's no reason to take them for granted. But I'm also very aware of the fact that the U.S. twice invaded the Dominican Republic; on the first ocassion leaving a dictator in power and in the second blocking the reinstatement of a democratically elected president.

The Dominican Republic gave me its language, its food, its music, its popular culture, baseball (an American invention, but I definitely get my deep interest in it from my Dominican roots), my revolutionary spirit, and my open-minded worldview. Because I have plenty of family out there and I want the country to prosper, my perspective of the world stage is different from that of a purely American or purely foreign point of view. But I'm also ashamed of the fact that the Dominican upper class tries to deny its African heritage, even though the musical instruments in our music suggest a strong link to Africa. The evident multiracial physical traits of our people are attributed to the indigenous people of Quisqueya according to revisionist historians, in spite of the mass extermination of the Taino tribes by the Spaniards upon arrival.

This is part of who I am, an imperfect person from two imperfect cultures. On this day in 1844, the Dominican Republic regained its independence by defeating the occupying military of Haiti. I thought this would be an appropriate time to share this bit about myself. ¡Felicidades a todos los Dominicanos celebrando hoy! Que Dios bendiga nuestra patria.

Details inside...

Thursday, January 18, 2007

Baseball Roundup

Bronx to host '08 All-Star Game in old Yankee Stadium's last year


Unnamed sources within Major League Baseball have unofficially announced that Yankee Stadium will host the 2008 All-Star Game. You'd think I would be excited about it.

I'm not.

I'm actually a little pissed off. The last time the Bronx had an All-Star Game was in 1977, the year after the Stadium was remodeled. Venues for the Midsummer Classic were picked by alternating AL and NL parks, and cities with new ballparks got preference. Now that the Yankees and New York City have finally reached an agreement on a new stadium, MLB decides that they'd rather have one last look at the old park. It's like having an old relative who doesn't keep in touch suddenly wanting to visit you when you're about to move to a better place.

And then the question becomes, "When do the Mets get to show off the new pad?"

The same story that announced MLB's plans for the '08 All-Stars has the 2009 edition earmarked for St. Louis. This leaves Queens's earliest possibility at 2011. Would the Commissioner's office really vouch for two All-Stars to be held in New York City in such close proximity? Given its contempt for large markets, the answer is most likely "No."

A rookie or not?


This week, Baseball America and ESPN's Alan Schwarz wrote an article for ESPN outlining his predictions for potential Rookies of the Year. First he offered a definition (actually the definition as defined by voting guidelines) of a rookie:

Like it or not, Daisuke Matsuzaka, eight-year veteran and 108-game winner in the Japanese Leagues, has officially pressed the reset button, kicked out the cord, and is rebooting as far as the major leagues are concerned. It doesn't matter that Hideo Nomo, Kazuhiro Sasaki and Ichiro Suzuki made mockeries of the official Rookie of the Year awards in their first seasons after coming west.


That's all well and good, but let's not forget that Hideki Matsui was left off some Rookie of the Year ballots completely in his "rookie" year of 2003. The writers who declined to vote for "Godzilla" claimed that he wasn't a pure rookie, being a seasoned veteran from the Japan Leagues.

Will Daisuke Matsuzaka be held to the same standard? Will he be good enough to put this potential hypocrisy to the test? I'm not so curious as to wish Matsuzaka well to find out.

Prosecutor investigating BALCO forced to resign


U.S. attorney Kevin Ryan, who has headed the investigation on the BALCO steroid distribution ring, was among a group of federal prosecutors who announced their resignations. There has been talk that the White House is pressuring these prosecutors to resign so Washington can appoint "interim" attorneys without Senate confirmation and no term limits, thanks to last year's USA Patriot Act reauthorization.

The provision in the Patriot Act was a last-minute addition by Sen. Arlen Specter (R-PA). What a schmuck.

Un-American to cheer for the Bears?




Rush Limbaugh took issue with Illinois Senator and potential presidential candidate Barack Obama for saying that New Orleans's football season was all but over. This is a reference to the upcoming Conference Championship between the New Orleans Saints and the Chicago Bears. The Saints have become something of a feel-good story given New Orleans's plight with Hurricane Katrina. Rush Limbaugh feels that Obama's comments are insensitive given that the Saints are "America's team."

Limbaugh thinks that it was politically incorrect to trash talk the Saints. Really, Rush? You mean like suggesting that Donovan McNabb's fame was due to the media overcrediting him for his team's success to fuel the media's own desire for an African-American quarterback to do well? I was just waiting to hear in the news that some right-wing asshole suggested McNabb an affirmative action hire.

Umm, so does this mean that it was un-American to root against the Yankees throughout the playoffs and World Series in 2001? Is Luís González an asshole for daring to get a bloop hit off Mo Rivera over a drawn-in infield? Or is this just Limbaugh's pathetic attempt to lead his audience away from the fact that the Bush administration was slow to provide relief to the citizens of the Gulf Coast, FEMA was incompetent in their efforts to do the same, and Sen. Joe Lieberman is backing down from his vow to use his position as chairman of the Senate Homeland Security Committee to investigate the administration's handling of the situation.

The conservatives are cringing at the very idea that a brown man might be President. Play the clip below to hear Rush spin this non-story.

Details inside...

Wednesday, January 10, 2007

The Twilight Zone: No Time Like the Past

This clip is timeless.


The most ignorant statement in this dialogue: "The virility of a nation is in direct proportion to its fight qualities." This declaration ignores the simple truth that power corrupts. Any person, corporation, institution, government or global power who gains or is granted too much power will abuse it. Yes, that goes for the United States, too, flag-wavers.

Details inside...